Anti-age Discrimination Legislation Re-introduced

DiscountSchoolSupply.com - Save Up to 70% Off Retail Every Day! Click Here!



Senator Chuck Grassley Press Release:

For Immediate Release
July 30, 2013

Anti-age Discrimination Legislation Re-introduced

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Iowa Senators Tom Harkin and Chuck Grassley joined with Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) in reintroducing legislation that addresses the Supreme Court’s decision in Gross v. FBL Financial and ensures vital civil rights protections for workers.  Harkin is the Chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee while Senators Leahy and Grassley are the Chairman and ranking member respectively of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Gross, it is harder for workers facing age discrimination and other forms of discrimination and retaliation to enforce their rights.  The Court held that plaintiffs alleging age discrimination must prove that age was the “but for” or deciding factor in an employment decision.  In contrast, plaintiffs alleging discrimination based on race, sex, national origin, and religion need only prove that discrimination was a “motivating factor.”  The Court’s holding specifically means that victims of age discrimination face a higher burden than those alleging race, sex, national origin or religious discrimination.  Lower courts have applied Gross to claims alleging discrimination on the basis of disability, and this June, the Supreme Court applied Grossto retaliation claims based on race, sex, national origin and religion under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

“We continue to advocate for this change for the simple reason that if an employee shows that age was a factor in an employment decision, the burden must be on the employer to prove that it acted for a legitimate reason other than age,” said Harkin.“This change has implications for Iowa and for older Americans around the country.  The purpose of The Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act is to reverse the Court’s decision and restore the law to what it was for decades to ensure that all older workers, and all victims of discrimination and retaliation based on race, sex, national origin, religion, age, and disability in this country enjoy the full protections of the law.”

“The decision in the Gross case has had a major impact on employment discrimination litigation across the country,” said Grassley.  “Congress needs to clarify the law to ensure that other people like Jack Gross aren’t put in similar situations.  Older Americans have immense value to our society and our economy.  They deserve the protections Congress originally intended.  The bill overturns the Gross decision in age discrimination cases, disability discrimination cases, and retaliation cases.   Last month, the Supreme Court extended the Gross decision to retaliation cases.  The need for the bill is even greater than before.”

“The Supreme Court’s divisive holding in Gross has created uncertainty in our civil rights laws, making it incumbent on Congress to clarify our intent and the statutory protections that all hardworking Americans deserve,” said Leahy.  “Our bipartisan bill re-establishes Congress’ intent that age discrimination is unlawful, and it makes clear that employers cannot get away with age discrimination by simply coming up with a reason to terminate an employee that sounds less controversial.  I commend Senator Harkin for his efforts over the past four years to restore the civil rights protections that all Americans deserve in the workplace, and I urge my fellow Senators to join our bipartisan effort.”

The Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act will restore fundamental fairness.

• The Act reverses the Gross decision and restores the law to what it was for decades before the Court’s decision.  The Act makes clear that when a victim shows discrimination was a “motivating factor” behind a decision, the burden is properly on the employer to show it complied with the law.
• 
  
• The Act is modeled on the Civil Rights Act of 1991, which passed the Senate on a bipartisan basis 93-5.  Among other things, the Civil Rights Act of 1991 codified the “motivating factor” framework for race, sex, national origin and religion discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• The Act makes clear that this “motivating factor” framework applies as well to the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act and retaliation claims involving race, sex, national origin and religion – addressing the Court’s recent decision in Nassar – thus treating these forms of discrimination and retaliation equally.
• 
  

“Too many older Americans trying to get or keep their jobs continue to face the significant barrier of age discrimination,” said Joyce A. Rogers, AARP Senior Vice President for Government Affairs.  “AARP strongly supports this bipartisan legislation and looks forward to continuing our work with Congress to protect the rights of older workers and others affected by job discrimination.”